Hanwha
PNO-A7082R
Bullet Camera · 3.9MP (2592×1520)
- • 105° HFOV at 4.6-9.35mm
- • 60 m effective range
- • 60 m IR illumination
- • Low-light / ColorVu sensor
Side-by-side comparison · cross brand
Hanwha PNO-A7082R vs Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR
Spec-by-spec comparison of two bullet camera models, with EN 62676-4 lens math and design recommendations.
Vivotek
IB9371-EHT-LR
Bullet Camera · 3.1MP (2048×1536)
- • 30° HFOV at 12-40mm
- • 80 m effective range
- • 60 m IR illumination
Specification side-by-side
| Hanwha PNO-A7082R | Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hanwha | Vivotek |
| Form factor | Bullet Camera | Bullet Camera |
| Resolution | 3.9MP (2592×1520) | 3.1MP (2048×1536) |
| Focal length | 4.6-9.35mm | 12-40mm |
| Horizontal FOV | 105° | 30° |
| Effective range | 60 m | 80 m |
| IR distance | 60 m | 60 m |
| Low-light / ColorVu | Yes | Standard |
Verdict
Hanwha PNO-A7082R captures more pixel detail (3.9 MP vs 3.1 MP), useful for license-plate or face identification at distance. Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR reaches further (80 m vs 60 m) — better for perimeter and parking-lot wide shots. Hanwha PNO-A7082R ships a low-light / ColorVu sensor — better in mixed-light retail or city-street scenes.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hanwha PNO-A7082R better than Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR?
Hanwha PNO-A7082R captures more pixel detail (3.9 MP vs 3.1 MP), useful for license-plate or face identification at distance. Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR reaches further (80 m vs 60 m) — better for perimeter and parking-lot wide shots. Hanwha PNO-A7082R ships a low-light / ColorVu sensor — better in mixed-light retail or city-street scenes. For installation-specific advice — mounting height, tilt, obstacle shadowing, BOM and PoE budget — drop both cameras into CCTVplanner and the FOV cones, DORI rings (per EN 62676-4) and cable schedule render in real time on a satellite map or imported floor plan.
What is the field of view of Hanwha PNO-A7082R vs Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR?
Hanwha PNO-A7082R has a 105° horizontal FOV at 4.6-9.35mm. Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR has a 30° horizontal FOV at 12-40mm. Hanwha covers a wider scene at the same distance; the FOV calculator on CCTVplanner converts these into linear meters of coverage at any chosen target distance.
Which camera has stronger IR illumination?
Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR reaches 60 m of IR illumination versus 60 m for Hanwha PNO-A7082R. The further-reaching IR camera is the better fit for unlit yards, parking perimeters and warehouses without permanent lighting.
Can I plan a project mixing Hanwha and Vivotek cameras?
Yes. CCTVplanner is multi-vendor by design — drop Hanwha and Vivotek cameras on the same canvas, share the same EN 62676-4 lens math and DORI ring overlays, and consolidate them into one BOM with cable schedule and PoE budget. Vendor design tools (Axis Site Designer, Hikvision HiTools, Dahua Project Design Tool, i-PRO SDT) cannot do this because each speaks only its own catalog.
Continue reading
FOV Calculator →
Convert 105° vs 30° HFOV into linear coverage at any distance.
DORI Calculator →
Compute Detect / Observe / Recognize / Identify ranges per EN 62676-4.
Bandwidth Calculator →
Estimate Mbps per camera for codec, FPS, scene complexity.
Browse all cameras →
66,571 verified models across 113 brands.
Test both cameras in your project
Drop Hanwha PNO-A7082R and Vivotek IB9371-EHT-LR on a real satellite map or imported floor plan. See live FOV cones, DORI rings, BOM and cable schedule in seconds.