Hanwha
PNO-A7082R
Bullet Camera · 3.9MP (2592×1520)
- • 105° HFOV at 4.6-9.35mm
- • 60 m effective range
- • 60 m IR illumination
- • Low-light / ColorVu sensor
Side-by-side comparison · cross brand
Hanwha PNO-A7082R vs Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1
Spec-by-spec comparison of two bullet camera models, with EN 62676-4 lens math and design recommendations.
Pelco
SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1
Bullet Camera · 3.7MP (2560×1440)
- • 36° HFOV at 9-22mm
- • 80 m effective range
- • 70 m IR illumination
- • Low-light / ColorVu sensor
Specification side-by-side
| Hanwha PNO-A7082R | Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Hanwha | Pelco |
| Form factor | Bullet Camera | Bullet Camera |
| Resolution | 3.9MP (2592×1520) | 3.7MP (2560×1440) |
| Focal length | 4.6-9.35mm | 9-22mm |
| Horizontal FOV | 105° | 36° |
| Effective range | 60 m | 80 m |
| IR distance | 60 m | 70 m |
| Low-light / ColorVu | Yes | Yes |
Verdict
Hanwha PNO-A7082R captures more pixel detail (3.9 MP vs 3.7 MP), useful for license-plate or face identification at distance. Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 reaches further (80 m vs 60 m) — better for perimeter and parking-lot wide shots.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hanwha PNO-A7082R better than Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1?
Hanwha PNO-A7082R captures more pixel detail (3.9 MP vs 3.7 MP), useful for license-plate or face identification at distance. Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 reaches further (80 m vs 60 m) — better for perimeter and parking-lot wide shots. For installation-specific advice — mounting height, tilt, obstacle shadowing, BOM and PoE budget — drop both cameras into CCTVplanner and the FOV cones, DORI rings (per EN 62676-4) and cable schedule render in real time on a satellite map or imported floor plan.
What is the field of view of Hanwha PNO-A7082R vs Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1?
Hanwha PNO-A7082R has a 105° horizontal FOV at 4.6-9.35mm. Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 has a 36° horizontal FOV at 9-22mm. Hanwha covers a wider scene at the same distance; the FOV calculator on CCTVplanner converts these into linear meters of coverage at any chosen target distance.
Which camera has stronger IR illumination?
Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 reaches 70 m of IR illumination versus 60 m for Hanwha PNO-A7082R. The further-reaching IR camera is the better fit for unlit yards, parking perimeters and warehouses without permanent lighting.
Can I plan a project mixing Hanwha and Pelco cameras?
Yes. CCTVplanner is multi-vendor by design — drop Hanwha and Pelco cameras on the same canvas, share the same EN 62676-4 lens math and DORI ring overlays, and consolidate them into one BOM with cable schedule and PoE budget. Vendor design tools (Axis Site Designer, Hikvision HiTools, Dahua Project Design Tool, i-PRO SDT) cannot do this because each speaks only its own catalog.
Continue reading
FOV Calculator →
Convert 105° vs 36° HFOV into linear coverage at any distance.
DORI Calculator →
Compute Detect / Observe / Recognize / Identify ranges per EN 62676-4.
Bandwidth Calculator →
Estimate Mbps per camera for codec, FPS, scene complexity.
Browse all cameras →
66,571 verified models across 113 brands.
Test both cameras in your project
Drop Hanwha PNO-A7082R and Pelco SRXE4-4V22-EBT-IR1 on a real satellite map or imported floor plan. See live FOV cones, DORI rings, BOM and cable schedule in seconds.